đ« The Hiring Bias Job Seekers Are Tired Of:- Breaking Down Coded Rejections and the Unspoken Gatekeeping
This article exposes the subtle language often used to mask bias in hiring decisions. We unpack 12 common âcodedâ rejection phrases, decode what they may really mean, and explore the impact of hidden bias on job seekers and diverse hiring contexts. With research-backed insights and practical tips, this article challenges hiring managers to re-evaluate how fairness and transparency show up in the recruitment process.
6/9/20253 min read


đ« The Hiring Bias Job Seekers Are Tired Of
: Breaking Down Coded Rejections and the Unspoken Gatekeeping
đŹ âWeâve decided to move forward with other candidatesâŠâ
Itâs a phrase job seekers know too well. But often, whatâs unspoken speaks volumes.
Behind the standard rejection email may lie unconscious bias, gatekeeping, or decisions based on non-transparent criteria that have little to do with qualifications.
Letâs talk about the hiring bias too many job seekers are tired of â and why itâs time to discuss it.
đ§ What Is Hiring Bias?
Hiring bias is when decisions are made â consciously or unconsciously â based on irrelevant or prejudiced factors rather than a candidateâs actual fit or capabilities.
It can show up as:
Preferring candidates with certain accents or appearances
Overlooking applicants from specific areas, schools, or cultural backgrounds
Judging âpersonality fitâ over professional merit
Penalizing career gaps, older age, or non-linear job paths
đ§© The Problem with âCodedâ Rejections
Hiring bias often hides behind vague phrases like:
Coded Phrase
What It May Actually Mean
"You're overqualified."
You might want more money, challenge our systems, or outshine leadership.
"We're looking for a better fit."
You donât blend with our existing culture or unwritten social norms.
"We went with someone more aligned."
We hired someone who looks, sounds, or thinks more like us.
"Weâre looking for someone more junior."
You're too experienced for the salary weâre offering.
"Your background is very diverse."
Weâre unsure how to place you into our rigid structure.
"Weâre prioritizing industry experience."
We donât want to train or adapt â even if your skills are transferable.
"We had a high volume of candidates."
We didnât seriously consider your application.
"Weâve paused hiring for now."
Weâve filled the role internally or changed the direction â without full transparency.
"You were a strong candidate, but..."
You werenât who we envisioned for this role â often for subjective or unstated reasons.
"Weâre pursuing internal candidates."
We already had someone in mind but needed to interview externally to meet policy.
"We donât think youâd be challenged."
We fear youâll get bored, leave quickly, or ask tough questions.
"You didnât seem enthusiastic enough."
You didnât perform emotional labour or overly sell yourself to match our unspoken expectations.
These phrases offer no actionable feedback and often leave job seekers stuck in a loop of rejection with no real insight.
đ What the Research Says
According to a Harvard Business Review study, applicants with âethnic-soundingâ names receive 50% fewer callbacks.
The Caribbean HR Review (2022) found that 48% of job seekers believe hiring in the region is more about âwho you knowâ than merit.
Women, older professionals, and career switchers face higher rejection rates even with equivalent or better qualifications.
đĄ How Employers Can Do Better
â
Use structured interviews â Ask all candidates the same core questions.
â
Remove identifiers in screening â such as name, age, address, or school where possible.
â
Focus on skills, not background â Create assessments tied to the role.
â
Be honest about rejections â Offer useful, human-centred feedback.
â
Diversify hiring panels â Avoid âgroupthinkâ by including varied perspectives.
đđœââïž For Job Seekers: Know This
Youâre not imagining it.
Hiring bias is real â and itâs exhausting. But the issue may not lie with you.
đč Build your brand anyway.
đč Apply anyway.
đč Speak up when you can.
đč Document and ask for feedback when rejected.
And remember: being overlooked doesnât mean youâre underqualified.
âConcluding Thoughts
The hiring process should be a bridge â not a wall.
Itâs time to break down coded rejections and build better hiring systems that reflect fairness, inclusivity, and transparency.
Because talent shouldnât have to fit a mold to be recognized.
đ Coming Soon on E-Job Info Corner:
âïž How to Recognize Hiring Bias in Your Organisation
âïž Interview Tips That Help You Stand Out (Without Code-Switching)
âïž Tools for Building an Inclusive Hiring Culture